2022 (11) TMI 1382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Om Parkash, Sr. DR ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the NFAC/CIT(A), New Delhi, dated 31.05.2022 pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The grounds of appeal read as under:- "That in any view of the matter the order passed by the CIT Appeal dated 31.05.2022 under section 250 of the Act, is illegal, invalid in so far as no opportunity wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unjustified incorrect as the said amount was already included in the gross receipt for assessment year 2015-16 and duly considered Hence addition is illegal. That in any view of the matter the bill amount of Rs.30,93,750/- and service tax amount Rs.3,82,387/- totalling Rs.34,76,137/- considered by the appellant as well as by department in the assessment year 2015-16 as per the method of a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... added in assessment year 2016- .17 simply on the basis of form no.26AS which is highly unjustified because it is a double taxation of same receipt of amount. 3. Brief facts of the case are that in this case, the assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed on 08.12.2018. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment by making the addition of a sum of Rs.34,76,137/-. 4. Against the above order, t....