Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (7) TMI 873

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder on the file of second respondent vide proceeding in DIN-20230359XN000011161D, dated 29.03.2023, quashing the same as illegal and devoid of merits and directing the second respondent to redo the assessment proceedings by considering the products as dairy based 'Milk Drinks'. 2. The case of the petitioner is that they are manufacturing and supplying the milk based drinks in different flavours under the brand names Chakra, Milma, Rajah, Nectorse, R2X, Milky Lips, Iris and also fruit based drinks in the name and style of MOH and SUN MOH and doing job work of manufacturing milk drinks. The petitioner would submit that during the investigation by the GST Intelligence Wing, Coimbatore Zonehad against the petitioner, they had conten....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....beverage, thereby contending that it has to be classified under Chapter-22 and not under Chapter-4. A test report of the ARS Food Testing Laboratory would clearly show that the petitioner's product is not water based and therefore, he would submit that since there is a serious dispute with reference to the very classification, this Court ought to interfere with the impugned order exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. Per contra, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under Section 107 of the Act. Without exhausting the said remedy, the petitioner has rushed to this Court. He wo....