2021 (9) TMI 1498
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....athan Senior Standing Counsel For the Respondent : Mr. N.V. Balaji JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) This Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "A" Bench, dated 05.06.2014 passed in I.T.A.No. 2190/Mds/2013 for the Assessment Year 2003-04. 2. Th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the assessee customer in India of operating net work payments, ATMs is not Royalty as per the provisions of Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act? 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that payments made to two companies no TDS is required to be deducted under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act?" 3. We have heard Mr.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ident supplier or manufacturer. ii) The second category of cases deals with resident Indian companies that act as distributors or resellers, by purchasing computer software from foreign, nonresident suppliers or manufacturers and then reselling the same to resident Indian end-users. iii)The third category concerns cases wherein the distributor happens to be a foreign, non-resident vendor, who,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uch distributors/end-users, which would amount to the use of or right to use any copyright. The provisions contained in the Income Tax Act (section 9 (1)(vi), along with explanations 2 and 4 thereof), which deal with royalty, not being more beneficial to the assessees, have no application in the facts of these cases. 173. Our answer to the question posed before us, is that the amounts paid by re....