Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (6) TMI 1098

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;I have heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner on this petition which assails an order dated 30 July, 2021 passed under Section 53 of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 read with Rule 55 of the Rules whereby Commissioner of State Tax has ordered as under :- Now therefore, considering the application made by the dealer under rule 55 of the Goa Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, I, Shri Hemant Kumar, I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-. The Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the Revenue however, submits that in the facts of the present case and considering that it was an offence under Section 22(1) of the Act, the maximum penalty would be Rs. 25,000/- under Section 44 clause (b) of the Act. 3. The second contention as urged on behalf of the petitioner is with regard to the following observations underscored in the order as quot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mpugned order would be required to be accepted being ex facie contrary to the provisions of the Act. Even assuming as to what has been stated on behalf of the Revenue that a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- would be maximum penalty under Section 44 of the Act or even if the petitioner is right in his contention that the maximum amount of penalty would be Rs. 10,000/- under notification dated 2 February, 20....