Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (11) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Appellant. R. C. Chaubey for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Technical Member.]. - These two appeals are by the Department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Nos. IND-I/41 & 42/2007, dated 27-2-2007 by which the penalties imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 have been set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Heard both sides. 3. The basi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lty imposed on the appellants as per the impugned orders have been set  aside. I would like to further state that the action on the part of adjudicating authority to consider the payments made already by the appellants for appropriation towards interest liability in the first instance and to hold that they are liable to pay certain balance amount as tax along with interest is quite improper a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Moreover, considering the fact that the entire gamut of taxation with reference to GTO service was under dispute and that the appellants have paid not only the tax amount but also the interest on account of delay in payment of tax, no penalty may be warranted on them." 5. From the above, it could be seen that there was dispute about payment of service tax which was settled by the Hon'ble Suprem....