2022 (3) TMI 1530
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Adv., Shri Lalit Mohan, CA For the Department : Shri Ishtiyaque Ahmed, CIT- DR ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- These two separate appeals by the assessee are preferred against two separate orders of the CIT[A] - 35, New dated 27.03.2018 and 05.04.2018 pertaining to Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. 2. The common grievance in both the appeals relates to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....value estimated by the DVO, the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,66,439/- in Assessment Year 2006-07 and Rs. 37,61,578/- in Assessment Year 2007-08. 5. Additions were challenged before the ld. CIT(A) but without any success. 6. Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee vehemently stated that once the investments have been properly recorded in the books of account by the assessee....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 2007-08 6,15,69,647 6,46,13,169 30,43,522 2008-09 12,47,29,721 13,08,95,383 61,65,662 2009-10 24,89,75,708 26,12,83,119 1,23,07,411 2010-11 12,09,71,650 12,69,51,543 59,79,893 Total 63,57,09,495 66,71,34,000 3,14,24,505 9. A perusal of the above chart clearly shows that the only reason for making the impugned addition is the difference ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... "4. In the present case, we find that the Tribunal decided the matter rightly in favour of the Assessee inasmuch as the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the assessing authority could not have referred the matter to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) without the books of account being rejected. In the present case, a categorical finding is recorded by the Tribunal that the books were ne....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI