Upgrade to AI Tools ✕

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Customs Duty Refund Denied Due to Lack of Evidence; Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment Applied, Section 28C Cited.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Refund of Customs Duty paid in excess - doctrine of unjust enrichment - In the present case, barring CA certificate, no other evidence has been produced by the Respondents before the Adjudicating Authority. As against this, the Department has clearly brought out certain evidence like the Respondents having not shown this amount as “receivables” in their books of account during the relevant time or not having produced any documents etc., as envisaged under Section 28C of the Customs Act. - the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing the refund is not correct - AT....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Customs Duty Refund Denied Due to Lack of Evidence; Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment Applied, Section 28C Cited.