2023 (6) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that the demand was confirmed against the appellant on the ground that the appellant has cleared the old and rejected capital goods by reversing cenvat credit. During the month of December, 2007 to January, 2008,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment latest by this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-IV Vs. Star Battery Limited Vice-Versa reported in 2019 (4) TMI 1254-CESTAT Kolkata, wherein the provisions of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, was declared as ultra vires. The observation of this Tribunal in the above cited case, is as under : "9. We have also carefully perused the decisions....