Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (3) TMI 1524

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shah, A.R For the Revenue : Shri S.S. Shukla, Sr. D.R ORDER PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The assessee by way of this Miscellaneous Application has requested to rectify the error in the order of the ITAT in ITA No. 2389/Ahd/2015 being a mistake apparent from the record. 2. The assessee in the Miscellaneous Application has submitted that it has claimed deduction u/s 42 of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e arguments advanced by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. 5. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on record. Admittedly, the ITAT was pleased to allow the depreciation to the assessee after making reference to the order of the ITAT in ITA No.3988/Ahd/2018 for the Assessment Hear 2005-06 vide order dated 31/12/2019 in the own case of the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the ITAT inadvertently. Thus the Ld. AR requested the bench to recall the impugned order to the extent of the issue with respect to additional depreciation for fresh hearing as per law. 7. On the contrary Ld. DR could not controvert the arguments advanced by the Ld. AR for the assessee. 8. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on reco....