Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (2) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hi, in I.T.A. No. 4762/Del/2005 for the assessment year 2004-05. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the appeal of the appellant/Revenue by holding that CIT (A) has rightly held in both the cases that the proportionate receipts were taxable in India. 2. It appears from the perusal of the prayer made in the memo of the appeal that only one appeal has been filed to set aside the composite judgment dated 10.10.2005 passed by CIT (Appeals). This appeal has been filed by the Revenue Department against only one assessee-Sundowner Offshore International (Burmuda) Ltd., C/o Nangia & Co. 75/7 Rajpur Road, Dehradun. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a non-resident company incorporated under the laws of Burmuda. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2.0121%. Thus, the proportionate revenue taxable in India amounts to Rs.9,47,4778/-. The appellant gets relief accordingly." The Revenue Department preferred the appeal before the ITAT against the judgment of CIT (A) and the ITAT after having considered the rival submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties and having perused the entire material available on record has held that CIT (A) has rightly directed the Assessing Officer in both the cases that the proportionate receipts were taxable in India and the receipts of the non-resident outside India were not taxable under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT has further held that the facts of the instant case are similar to the facts of the case of Saipem SPA Vs. CIT, hence....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n (2) provides that amounts referred shall be amount paid or payable to the assessee (whether in or out of India) and the amount received or deemed to be received in India on account of the provision of services and facilities in connection with, or supply of plant and machinery on hire used, or to be used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils in India. Reimbursement of catering expenses etc. is also liable to be included. This is receipt and is taxable. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was right in adding the above amount which was received by the assessee non-resident company from the ONGC. Therefore, in our opinion, the ITAT fell into error in taking the contrary view. Section 44BB is a complete code in it....