Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (5) TMI 704

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../- being 8% of gross receipts u/s 145(3) of the Act on account of non-maintenance of books of accounts and on estimation of net profit. The assessee, admittedly, was required to get his books of account audited as required u/s 44AB of the Act and on account of failure to do so, the Assessing Officer levied penalty u/s 271B of the Act which has been confirmed by the CIT(A). 3. Now, the contention of the ld. Counsel for the assessee is that where the assessee did not maintain books of account, the penalty u/s 271B could not be levied for failure of the assessee to get books of account audited as the question of audit of books of account does not arise where the books of accounts have not been maintained at all. The ld. Counsel for the assessee in this respect has relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Bisauli Tractors reported in (2007) 165 taxman 0001. 4. We have gone through the order of the ITAT, Ranchi Bench, in the own case of the assessee in respect of quantum appeal for the year under consideration. We find that the assessee has not presented the true and correct facts. A perusal of para 5 of the order of ITAT dated 07.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....siness are deemed to be the profits and gains of the assessee under section 44AD and he has claimed such income to be lower than the profits and gains so deemed to be the profits and gains of his business and his income exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax during such previous year,] keep and maintain such books of account and other documents as may enable the ^15[Assessing] Officer to compute his total income in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (3) The Board may, having regard to the nature of the business or profession carried on by any class of persons, prescribe^16, by rules, the books of account and other documents (including inventories, wherever necessary) to be kept and maintained under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the particulars to be contained therein and the form and the manner in which and the place at which they shall be kept and maintained. (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (3), the Board may prescribe, by rules, the period for which the books of account and other documents to be kept and maintained under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be retained.]" "44AB....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gross receipts, as the case may be, in business does not exceed two crore rupees in such previous year: Provided further that this section shall not apply to the person, who derives income of the nature referred to in section 44B or section 44BBA, on and from the 1st day of April, 1985 or, as the case may be, the date on which the relevant section came into force, whichever is later : Provided also that in a case where such person is required by or under any other law to get his accounts audited, it shall be sufficient compliance with the provisions of this section if such person gets the accounts of such business or profession audited under such law before the specified date and furnishes by that date the report of the audit as required under such other law and a further report by an accountant in the form prescribed under this section. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,- (i) "accountant" shall have the same meaning as in the Explanation below sub-section (2) of section 288; (ii) "specified date", in relation to the accounts of the assessee of the previous year relevant to an assessment year, means 91[date one month prior to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sser penalty or for no penalty for committing his wrongful act of even not maintaining his books of account will amount to allowing a person to take the benefit of his own wrong. The person, who have different class being their turnover very high has been assigned double responsibility i.e. firstly, maintaining their books of account and secondly get their books of account audited. Whereas the persons with lesser receipts or turnover have been given single responsibility of maintaining their books of accounts. Under the circumstances, the persons with lesser responsibility have been subjected to lesser penalty for non-compliance of the statutory requirement. However, the persons having higher turnover have been given the responsibility of also get their books of account audited and are subjected to higher penalty. In our humble view, the persons who have been given double responsibility of maintaining books of account and audit of the accounts are liable to be subjected to penalty on both counts and they cannot be equated with the persons given single/lesser responsibility for their own wrongful act or omission. This can be explained by an example. Suppose there are two persons nam....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y u/s 271A of the Act. The relevant part of the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court is reproduced as under: "7. Applying all this to the present case, it emerges that the Assessing Officer had initiated penalty proceedings in his assessment order dated 30-5-1986 only for non-maintenance of account books by the assessee and not for its failure to have its accounts audited under section 44AB. That is why he firstly issued notice dated 11-11-1987 under section 271A and passed the final penalty order on 28-12-1988. He did not record default of non-audit of accounts in his order and, consequently, his direction for initiation of penalty proceedings contained in his assessment order would not cover his second notice dated 11-9-1989 issued under section 271B. The second notice, accordingly, cannot be held time-barred by reckoning the limitation period from 30-3-1987 and expirable on 3-8-1989. 8. It remains to be seen whether proceedings under section 271B were necessarily required to be initiated in the assessment proceedings of the relevant assessment year. But as it is, the defaults contemplated by section 271A and section 271B are separate and distinct. Under the l....