2018 (11) TMI 1935
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Poddar, Advocate ORDER Per Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-President (KZ):- This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Kolkata dated 06.07.2017 whereby he cancelled the penalty of Rs. 8,68,77,800/- imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee in the present case is a Company, which is eng....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1. On the basis of the information contained in the said report, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee had failed to report the international transactions with its Associated Enterprises and had also furnished incorrect information in the return of income with reference to the said transactions. He accordingly invoked the provisions of section 271AA and imposed a penalty of Rs. 8,68,77,800/....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n record. It is observed that the penalty in this case was imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271AA of the Act, the provisions of which as applicable to the year under consideration were as under:- "271AA- Penalty for failure to keep and maintain information and document in respect of international transactions - Without prejudice to the provisions of section 271, if any person fails....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or furnishes an incorrect information or document, the Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals) may direct that such person shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to two per cent of the value of each international transaction entered into by such person". 5. A perusal of the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer in the present case shows that the penalty under section 271AA was impo....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI