2019 (8) TMI 1865

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessee against the order of CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad dated 02.12.2016 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The grounds raised by the assessee are as under :- "1. Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals has erred in confirming the Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) r.w.s. 200(3) of Rs.1,09,304/- same may please be deleted. 2. CIT(A) has erred in not cancelling the penalty order by CIT, as said order is without pre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ting of the tax to the Government Account, the penalty leviable by the Assessing Officer should be in the range of Rs.16,300/- (delay of 163 days only) and not the delay and amount of penalty as quantified by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A). Further, ld. Counsel mentioned that this matter can be verified again by the CIT(A) and the issue can be remanded to the file of the CIT(A). Further, ld.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a). We find the contents of para 28 of the said order of the Tribunal (supra) is relevant in this regard and the same are extracted hereunder :- "28. .......... We hold so. In this bunch of appeals, there are cases where the assessee has defaulted in restricted from the date of payment of TDS to the date of filing e-TDS statements in such cases, the returns were delayed because of default on beh....