Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2008 (11) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri Sumit Kumar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per: P.K. Das, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the appellants are providing taxable services of "Mandap Keeper". It has been alleged that during the period 2004-2005, they have charged "Service Charges" in their Bill at 5%, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tification. It is also observed that there is no evidence placed by the appellant for claiming the abatement of 60% of the amount in their bills. The ld. Advocate submits that they had placed the bills to the lower authorities. He drew the attention of the Bench to the copies of the Bills. In our view, the matter is required to be verified in respect of the availment of the benefit of the notifica....

PrevPreviousNextNext