Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 1400

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowance of Depreciation on Goodwill - Ground No. 4.1 to 4.8 3. The assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of software development (SWD) services. It filed return of income for AY 2016-17 on 29.11.2016 declaring a loss of Rs.31,02,84,450. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS and a notice u/s. 143(2) was served on the assessee. Since the assessee had international transactions, reference was made to the TPO in order to determine the arm's length price [ALP] of the international transactions with Associated Enterprises [AE]. The TPO made TP adjustment in SWD segment and interest on receivables for an amount of Rs.11,50,59,080. The AO passed the draft assessment order incorporating the TP adjustment. In addition to TP adjustment, the AO also made a disallowance of depreciation on goodwill claimed by the assessee. The assessee filed objections before the DRP. 4. The DRP confirmed the TP adjustment and the addition towards depreciation on goodwill. The DRP's directions with respect to interest on delayed receivables resulted in an increase of TP adjustment by Rs.34,35,189. Consequently, the AO passed the final assessment order against which the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imit and the same is not applied by the TPO. The DRP rejected the contention of the assessee stating that there is no correlation between the profit margins and the turnover of companies as far as service sector is concerned. 11. Before us the ld. AR reiterated the submissions made before the lower authorities and also drew our attention to the decision of the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of BORQS Software Solutions P. Ltd. v. ITO in IT(TP)A No.310/Bang/2021 by order dated 25.10.2021 for AY 2016-17 in this regard. This Tribunal in the case of ON Semiconductor Technology India P. Ltd. in IT(TP)A No.291/Bang/2021 dated 21.72.2022 following the decision of BORQS Software Solutions P. Ltd. (supra) has held as follows:- "13. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of BORQS Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (supra) has considered a host of rulings on this issue including that of Hon'ble High Courts wherein divergent views were taken with respect to the application of different filters. It was held by the Tribunal that the application of the turnover filter is justified on the basis o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that it is functionally not comparable for AY 2015-16 and therefore the margin of that year should be exclude while computing the average margin of that company. The ld. AR placed reliance on the decision of BORQS Software Solutions P. Ltd. (supra) wherein it was held that - "28. The above conclusions of the DRP have not been countered by the Assessee and by merely relying on findings in earlier AY that this company was held to be not a comparable company, the Assessee cannot seek exclusion of this company from the list of comparable companies. The only direction that the Assessee can get is that the margins for AY 2015-16 in which year this company was regarded as not comparable have to be ignored in arriving at the average of three years profit margin of this company. We direct accordingly." 16. Respectfully following the above decision of the Tribunal, we direct the AO to exclude the margin for AY 2015-16 of while arriving at the 3 year average profit of Infobeans Technologies Ltd. 17. The next issue contended is with regard to the working capital adjustment. The TPO did not allow any adjustment on the working capital [pg. 51 of TP order] and the same is upheld by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing turns on the decision relied upon by the CIT (A) in the impugned order. In the matter of determination of Arm's Length Price, it cannot be said that the burden is on the Assessee or the Department to show what is the Arm's Length Price. The data available with the Assessee and the Department would be the starting point and depending on the facts and circumstances of a case further details can be called for. As far as the Assessee is concerned, the facts and figures with regard to his business has to be furnished. Regarding comparable companies, one has to fall back upon only on the information available in the public domain. If that information is insufficient, it is beyond the power of the Assessee to produce the correct information about the comparable companies. The Revenue has on the other hand powers to compel production of the required details from the comparable companies. If that power is not exercised to find out the truth then it is no defence to say that the Assessee has not furnished the required details and on that score deny adjustment on account of working capital differences. Regarding applying the daily balances of inventory, receivables and payables fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t of net profit margin in the open market. It is not the case of the CIT (A) that differences in working capital requirements of the international transaction and the uncontrolled comparable transactions is not a difference which will materially affect the amount of net profit margin in the open market. If for reasons given by CIT (A) working capital adjustment cannot be allowed to the profit margins, then the comparable uncontrolled transactions chosen for the purpose of comparison will have to be treated as not comparable in terms of Rule 10B(3) of the Rules, which provides as follows: "(3) An uncontrolled transaction shall be comparable to an international transaction if- (i) none of the differences, if any, between the transactions being compared, or between the enterprises entering into such transactions are likely to materially affect the price or cost charged to paid in, or the profit arising from, such transactions in the open market; or (ii) reasonably accurate adjustments can be made to eliminate the material effects of such differences." 18. In such a scenario there would remain no comparable uncontrolled transactions for the purpose o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bechtel India P. Ltd. in ITA No.1478/Del/2015 which was confirmed by the Delhi High Court and the SLP before the Supreme Court was dismissed. Therefore, the principle laid down by the Delhi Tribunal with regard to interest on receivables has reached finality. 23. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We notice that in the case of Bechtel India P. Ltd. (supra), the Delhi Tribunal has held that if the assessee is a debt free company, it is not justifiable to presume that borrowed funds have been utilized to pass on the facility to its AEs. In the present case, the ld. AR submits that the assessee is a debt free company. We also notice that the coordinate Bench of this in Barracuda Networks India Pvt. Ltd. in IT(TP)A No.229/Bang/2021 has held that - "41. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. On the question whether delayed realization of trade receivables from the AE constitutes an international transaction or not, there are conflicting decisions of various benches of the Tribunal, which we shall point out. section 92B of the Act defining what is an international transaction was amended by Finance Act, 2012, way of inse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(India) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2017] 87 taxmann.com 251 (Delhi - Trib) the ITAT Delhi Bench held that undoubtedly the receivable or any other debt arising during the course of the business is included in the definition of 'capital financing' as an 'international transaction' as per explanation 2 to section 92B of the Act w.e.f. 1-4-2002 inserted by the Finance Act 2012. Therefore, even the outstanding receivable partake the character of capital financing and consequently, overdue outstanding is an "international transaction". The natural corollary would be of imputing interest on such "capital financing" if same is not charged at arm's length. The ITAT concluded that if outstanding receivables are within the terms of agreement, then it may be argued that interest on such outstanding is already covered in the sale price of the goods. However, if the agreement does not specify the term of the payment, even then assessee must be given benefit of credit period which is accepted business practice in the trade. The ITAT confirmed 30 days as the normal credit period adopted by the TPO. 42. The foregoing discussion discloses that non-charging or under- charging of i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Such delay ranges from 175 days to 217 days. The remaining pages disclose no realization of invoices up to 31st March, 2010. When we consider the dates of invoices in the remaining pages, it is manifested that in certain cases these invoices have been raised on 31st August, 30th or September or 31st October, 2009. In all such cases, the period of 150 days already stood expired as on 31st March, 2010 and the assessee ought to have charged interest on the delay in realizing such invoices along with the first three and a half pages in which there is an absolute and identified delay in realization of invoices beyond the stipulated period. When the interest for realization of trade advances up to 150 days is part and parcel of the price charged from the AE, then the delay up to this extent cannot give rise to a separate international transaction of interest uncharged. Rather interest for the period in excess of normally realizable period in an uncontrolled situation upto 150 days needs to be considered in the determining the ALP of the international transaction of the 'Provision of IT Enabled data conversion services'. This can be done by increasing the revenue charged by the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... determines the rate of interest and hence the prime lending rate should not be considered for determining the interest rate. Under such circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the file of TPO/AO for a fresh determination of addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment towards interest not realized from its AE on the debts arising during the course of business in line with our above observations." 44. We are of the view that the issue with regard to determination of ALP in respect of the international transaction of giving extended credit period for receivables should be directed to be examined afresh by the AO/TPO on the guidelines laid down in the decision referred to in the earlier paragraph, after affording Assessee opportunity of being heard. As held in the aforesaid decision the prime lending rate should not be considered and this reasoning will apply to adopting short term deposit interest rate offered by State Bank of India (SBI) also. The rate of interest would be on the basis of the currency in which the loan is to be repaid. We hold and direct accordingly. All issues on determination of ALP of the transaction are kept open." ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t prior to amalgamation and post amalgamation assessee acquired the goodwill. This aspect has been very well explained in the decision of Hon'ble Delhi Tribunal in the case of Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. (supra) as under : "60. The DR further emphasized that if the 6th proviso to section 32 (i) is considered the depreciation under this provision is to be restricted to the amount considering that amalgamation has not taken place and since in the hands of the amalgamating companies the depreciation on goodwill would have been zero there cannot be deprecation in the hand of the amalgamated company. In support reliance was placed on the decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal Bangalore in ITA No. 722, 801 and 1065/Bang/2014. Once again the DR is not appreciating the facts of the case in hand in their true perspective. It has to be understood that there was no goodwill in the books of amalgamating companies and only after the scheme of amalgamation, when the amalgamating companies amalgamated, goodwill came into existence being the difference between the consideration paid by amalgamated company over and above the net asset value of the amalgamating compan....