Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (4) TMI 416

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. S. Sunil, Adv. For the Respondents Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. Standing Counsel for R-3. Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Aman Rewaria & Mr. Farman Ali, Advs. For R-4. ORDER 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, New Delhi (hereafter 'CAAR') whereby the products proposed to be imported by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Circular No.163/2019/2021-GST) had not been brought to the notice of this Court. He submits that in terms of the said circular, the GST Council had clarified that "Scented Sweet Supari" falls under tariff item 21069030 as "Betel Nut product" known as "Supari" and attracts GST rate of 18%. It is clarified as under: "7. Applicability of GST on scented sweet supari & flavored and coated illaichi:....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e III of notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017)." 4. Mr. Ramachandran, learned counsel for the respondent submits that it is possible for the GST Department to have a separate classification and the same is not governed by the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5. This Court is not called upon to examine the validity of the said circular. The decision of the learned CAAR as well as....