TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (3) TMI 801
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ved by them, they are paying the Service Tax. The Ld. Chartered Accountant appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that when their construction activity is taken up initially, it will not be known as to what percentage of constructed area would be sold and what percentage of area could be retained for leasing out the same. Therefore, they have been taking the Cenvat Credit on various inputs and services as to when they are received by the appellant. However, when a portion of the constructed area is sold, the proportionate Cenvat Credit is reversed by them. He draws attention to the Table at Para 6 of the Grounds of Appeal which is reproduced below:- Particulars October 2007 to March 2008 April 2008 to September 2010 Total ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....red Accountant states that since the inputs in question have been used for provision of Service they are eligible for the Cenvat Credit in terms of Rule 2 (l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He relies on the following case laws:- (i) Sai Samhita Storages Private Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vishakhapatnam-II [2010 (255) E. L. T. 91 (Tri-Bang.) The same has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court [2011 (2) TMI 400-AP High Court] (ii) Navraratna S G Highway Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CST, Ahemedabad [2012-TIOL-1245-CESTAT-AHM] (iii) Nirlon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai [2016 (2) TMI 417 CESTAT-Mumbai] (IV) Lemon Tree Hotel (Cyber Hills Developers (P) Ltd.) Vs. CC & CE, Hyderabad-I....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....missioner (Appeals) and submits that since the input in question have been used in the construction of immovable property, the appellant is not eligible for the Cenvat Credit on such items. Therefore, he submits that the lower Authorities have correctly confirmed demands. 5. Heard both sides. 6. It is seen that the appellant has taken Cenvat Credit of Rs.2,29,99,232/- during the period under consideration. When they are not eligible for Cenvat Credit on account of constructed property which is sold, they have been regularly reversing the Cenvat Credit. These facts are being regularly disclosed in the ST-3 Returns as well as in the accompanying letter submitted to the Range/Division officials. 7. In respect of the constructed portio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....case also, without utilizing the service, mall could not have been constructed and therefore the renting of immovable property would not have been possible. The issue involved is squarely covered by the decision of the Ho'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Since the service tax demand itself is not sustainable, the question of imposition of penalty does not arise. The appeal is allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. 1o. In case of CCE Vishakhapatnam II vs. Sai Sahmita Storages (P) Ltd, this decision of the Bangalore Tribunal has availed by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court [2011 (2) TMI 400-AP High Court], has held as under:- 9. There is no dispute, in these cases, that the assessee used cement and TMT bar for p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... upon the Board's Circular No. 98/1/2008-ST to confirm the demands raised by the show-cause notice. After relying upon the Navratna SG Highway Prop. (P) Ltd. case law, the Tribunal has held as under:- 6.2 In view of the ratio of the higher judicial forum and the facts of the case in hand are the same, we hold that the impugned order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside and we do so. 11. The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of GST & CE, Chennai vs. Dymos India Automotive Pvt. Ltd. [2018 (9) TMI 1135 Madras HC] has held as under:- 9. The Tribunal took note of the allegations in the said show notice i.e. the assessee was not eligible for input service credit availed under the head 'commercial or indust....