Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year 2013-14 inter-alia on the ground that the same was issued in the name of a non-existent company. 2. Briefly stated the material facts are as under : 2.1 A notice dated 22nd June 2021 under section 148 of the Act was issued in the name of M/s. Pinkhem Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. seeking to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2013-14 on the ground that the Assessing Officer had reasons to believe that the income chargeable to tax for the said assessment year has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Act. Subsequently, pursuant to the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 138 taxmann.com 64 (SC), a notice under section 148A(b) of the Act was issued again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion. 4. The petitioner also states that pursuant to the order dated 31st July 2022 under section 148A(d) of the Act, the petitioner addressed a communication dated 28th September 2022 bringing to the notice of the respondents yet again the factum of amalgamation of M/s. Pinkhem Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. and further that the said company had ceased to exist with effect from 1st April 2015. 5. In the aforementioned background, it was urged that the entire re-assessment proceedings were unsustainable in law. It was also urged that even the approval granted by the competent authority had been accorded by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-08 in the name of M/s. Pinkhem Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. which had ceased to exist on the dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....text in which the term is used may show that it is intended to include such an acquisition. See: Halsbury's Laws of England (4th edition volume 7 para 1539). Two companies may join to form a new company, but there may be absorption or blending of one by the other, both amount to amalgamation. When two companies are merged and are so joined, as to form a third company or one is absorbed into one or blended with another, the amalgamating company loses its entity." In the case of Spice Entertainment Ltd. V/s. CST 2012 (280) ELT 43 (Delhi) a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court held that once the factum of amalgamation of a company had been brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer, despite which the proceedings are continued and a....