Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 342

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....levy of penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010-11 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee, an individual and Proprietor of M/s. Shreeji Trading Company which is engaged in the business of trading in gold, silver bullions and other precious metals. The assessee filed his Returns of Income under section 139 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15.10.2010; for the Assessment Year 2011-12 on 28.09.2011 and for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 29.03.2013. A Search operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was carried out at the residence and business premises of the assessee on 20.05.2013. Thereaf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... total disregard to the facts of the case and submissions made by the assessee, levied penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each for all the three Assessment Years vide orders dated 30.09.2020 u/s. 271F of the Act. 3. Aggrieved against the penalty orders, the assessee filed appeals before Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Ahmedabad. The assessee has not appeared before the ld. CIT(A) inspite of 15 opportunities given to the assessee. Therefore the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the levy of penalty u/s. 271F of the Act, relying upon few ITAT decisions. 4. Aggrieved against the same, the assessee is in appeal before us raising the following Grounds of Appeal: 1. The grounds of appeal mentioned hereunder are without prejudice to one another.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssment year was not filed before the end of that year. It cannot be imposed in a case where return of income is filed after the statutorily prescribed due date, but prior to the end of the relevant assessment year. (d) The AO referred to the later part of clause (a) of section 153A and held that other provisions of the Act including provisions of section 271F of the Act are applicable in the case of the search related assessments and as the appellant has not filed the return of the income within 30 days from the receipt of notice issued u/s. 153A/153C of the Act, is liable for penal action u/s 271F of the Act. Here it is pertinent to note that in stretching/co-relating the applicability of provisions of section 271F to section 153A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bai on 08.08.2014 and simultaneously filed return of income with the AO. Copy of order u/s.245D (1) is attached at Page 4 to 16. Thus, since there is reasonable cause for delay in filing return of income no penalty could be levied. (f) In view of the above, the appellant most respectfully submits that penalty levied on misapprehension of facts may kindly be deleted. 5. Per contra, the Ld. Sr. D.R. Mr. B. D. Gupta appearing for the Revenue supported the orders passed by the Lower Authorities and pleaded to confirm the levy of penalty. 6. We have given our thoughtful consideration and perused the materials available on record. The first argument of the assessee namely that the penalty provisions of Section 271F are not applicab....