Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1856

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cha For the Respondent : Mr.F.V.Irani i/b Mr.Atul K.Jasani ORDER P.C.: Heard. 2. Both these Appeals under section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') challenge a common order dated 31 March 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ('Tribunal'). The Appeals relate to Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10. Thus the two Appeals. 3. Ms.Bharucha, learned couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s question as proposed therein on the grounds that the same in the facts of the case was academic in nature. This for the reason what was being paid by the Indian entity to its Singapore branch was only in the nature of reimbursement of expenses. This finding of fact was not challenged in the Revenue's appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 or in these appeals for Assessment Year 2008-09 and 2009-10. ....