TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2008 (8) TMI 105
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eferred by the Commissioner of Customs against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Principal Bench), New Delhi on 31.08.2007 in Customs Appeal 325/2007-SM(BR). 2. The respondent had entered into a contract on 26.04.1999 with Air Headquarters, Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi for supply and installation of a DTS system at a contracted price of Rs 81,89,000/-. For the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t that the classification for the imported CCTV systems had been rightly done by the respondent under the Heading 8530.80. 3. In view of the above, the respondent, being entitled to a refund, filed a refund application for the said excess duty paid to the extent of Rs 4,43,496/-. The refund application was ultimately allowed by the Deputy Commissioner (Refund). However, it was directed by him tha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y the appellant was beyond the contracted price. Consequently, it was directed that the respondent be allowed the consequential relief and the refund be made to it. 5. We are of the view that the finding arrived at by the Tribunal cannot be interfered with for more than one reason. The first reason being that no perversity in the said finding has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the ap....