2008 (9) TMI 95

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der No. A-925/Kol./2008 dt. 17.9.2008 certified on 25.9.2008 in Appeal No. ST/28/2007) Shri K.K. Banerjee, Advocate for the Appellant. Dr. Gautam Ray, Jt. CDR for the Respondent. [Order per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Member (Technical)] - Heard both sides. 2. At the outset, Dr. Gautam Ray, Ld. Jt. CDR appearing for the Department states that at the time of hearing of stay application, a wrong ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evious period from 10.9.04 to15.6.2005 for the very services rendered under the category of Business Auxiliary Services The Ld. Jt. CDR argues that at the material time the services rendered by the appellants were under the general category of Business Auxiliary Services and after 15.6.05, specific category of services has been carved out under the Business Auxiliary Services to cover the transpor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of gas through pipeline is an activity which has been newly brought under the Service Tax net after 15.6.05. The nature of activity has not changed after 15.6.05 and there was no change in the services rendered by the appellants prior to 15.6.2005 and after that date. The case of the Department to bring the appellants under the Service Tax net for the pervious period is not convincing. The natur....