Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 809

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pune revising the petitioner's declaration for the assessment year 2014-15 by issuing a revised Form 3 seeking additional demand. 2. The petitioner fled his return of income for assessment year 2014-15 declaring a total income of Rs.64,47,850/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and an order of assessment came to be passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') on 16th December 2016. An amount of Rs.98,75,513/- was added to the income of the petitioner. 3. An appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Rectification application also came to be fled by the petitioner before the Assessing Officer seeking rectification of the computation of the tax payable. Rectification....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on passed by the AO that the income had to be taxed as long term capital gain at a lower rate of 20%. 7. Objections raised by the petitioner were rejected by virtue of communication, dated 29th October 2021. What is stated in the communication, dated 29th October 2021 which is impugned in the present petition justifying the issuance of the revised Form 3 is the fact that during the assessment proceedings under section 143(3), as against the returned income of Rs.46,67,850/- by the petitioner an addition of Rs.98,75,513/- was made determining the total income at Rs.1,63,23,363/- and the same was taxed at the rate of 30% denying the claim of exemption of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) under section 10(38) of the Act and taxed the same as un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been changed as there was no apparent mistake warranting such a rectification. It was stated that the order passed under section 154 by the Assessing Officer on 2nd November 2021 was erroneous and that after rejection of the claim of adding long term capital gain of the petitioner by the Assessing Officer, such addition was made as 'uncounted income' ought to be charged to tax in accordance with the rigor of the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act only. 12. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 13. Admittedly, post the order of assessment under section 143(3) of the Act, the Assessing Officer passed an order on the application seeking rectification in terms of section 154 of the Act, which reads as under : Order ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....duction or increase in the income and tax liability of the assessee as a result of rectification, the disputed tax in such cases would be calculated after giving effect to the rectification order passed, if any. 15. Reference in this regard can be made to the clarification issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes ("CBDT") vide circular No.9 of 2020 dated 22 April 2020 and in particular Question No.25 thereof, which reads as under : Question No.25 Answer In a case appeal or arbitration is pending on the specified date, but a rectification is also pending with the AO which is accepted will reduce the total assessed income. Will the calculation of disputed tax be circulated on rectified total assessed income ? The rectificati....