Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ified in imposing penalty under section 271 A at Rs. 25,000/- ii. That on estimate basis income was estimated Rs. 4,59,800/- as against Rs. 31,177/- shown. iii. That the authority below was not justified in imposing penalty u/s 271A to a petty dairy income. iv. That however assessed tax has also been paid." 3. The assessee is an individual and did not file any return of income under section 139 of the Income Tax Act for the year under consideration. Since there were deposits in the bank accounts of the assessee during the year under consideration to the tune of Rs. 5,19,42,482/-, therefore, the AO issued notice under section 142(1) on 02.01.2018 calling the assessee to file the return of income on or before 01.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as the turnover of the assessee as well as income from business was not more than the minimum limit provided under the said provision. The assessee submitted that the income from Dairy business was only Rs. 31,177/- and the balance was agriculture income of Rs. 15,70,000/-. The AO accepted the agriculture income at Rs. 11,10,200/- for want of proof of the balance agriculture income. Hence, the difference was added by the AO to the income from Dairy business. The assessee pleaded that the penalty levied by the AO may be deleted. The CIT(A) was not impressed with the reply of the assessee and confirmed the penalty levied by the AO under section 271A of the Income Tax Act. 4. Before the Tribunal, the learned AR of the assessee has submitte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aintain the books of accounts. He has relied upon the orders of the authorities below. 6. I have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The ACIT while passing the order under section 271A of the Income Tax Act has given the reasons for levy of penalty in para 3 to 5 as under:- "3. The issue against which penalty proceedings u/s 271A was initiated during the assessment proceedings is discussed as under.- The assessee has not filed return of income u/s 139 for AY 2017-18. During the assessment proceedings, the assessee has filed manual return of income declaring total income at Rs. 31,177/- and net agriculture income of Rs. 15,70,200/-. The manual return submitted by the assessee was trea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aintenance of books of accounts and other documents required to be maintained as per section 44AA of the Act. The assessee has not furnished any reasonable cause which prevented him from doing so. Thus, the assessee has defaulted in maintaining books of accounts and other documents as per section 44AA of the Act for the Assessment Year under consideration and hence, liable for penalty u/s. 271A of the IT Act. 5. In view of the above facts, it is held that this is a fit case for levy of penalty u/s.271A of the Act. Accordingly, penalty u/s 271A of Rs. 25,000/- is hereby levied. Demand notice is issued accordingly." 7. Thus, the ACIT has taken the total income assessed at Rs. 6,55,570/- while passing the assessment order under sec....