TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (2) TMI 731
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ein is whether the appellants are eligible for refund of Service Tax paid on specified services which are wholly consumed within the SEZ as per notification no. 9/2009-ST dated 03.03.2009 as amended vide notification no.15/2009-ST dated 20.05.2009? 3. The facts leading to the filing of the instant appeal are stated in brief as follows. The appellant herein filed refund claim of Rs. 6,83,442/- for the period from 15th December 2009 to 30th June 2010 for Service Tax paid on the specified service used in relation to the authorised operations in the SEZ under notification (supra). The adjudicating authority vide order-inoriginal dated 27.12.2010 sanctioned refund claim amounting to Rs. 4,88,315/- and rejected the claim for the amount of Rs. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-Mumbai), M/s. Barclay Technology Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE Pune III 2015-TIOL-82-CESTAT-MUM and one decision in their own case on similar issue in the matter of M/s. Vishay Semiconductor India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CC,GST, Mumbai Central which was decided by this Tribunal vide final order no. A/86782/2019 dated 20.09.2019. Per contra learned Authorised Representative appearing on behalf of Revenue supported the findings recorded in the impugned order and placed reliance on the decision of this Tribunal in the matter of Everest Industries Ltd. vs. CCE Meerut I 2013 (31) STR 189 (Tri-Del). 5. Heard rival submissions and perused the case records, synopsis/written submission and case laws placed on record by the respective sides. In order to a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed wholly within the Special Economic Zone;" 6. I have gone through the SEZ Act, 2005 and its section 26 (i)(e) specifically provides that all services imported into the SEZ to carry out authorised operation in SEZ shall be exempted. Further in terms of section 51 of the SEZ Act the provisions of the SEZ Act shall have overriding effect over all provisions of any other law for the time being in force and it is settled legal principle that any rule or notification cannot override the Act. Otherwise also the issue involved herein is no longer res integra in view of the decision of this Tribunal in the matter of EON Kharadi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (supra) in which the Tribunal on an identical issue while deciding in favour of assessee held....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Tax which ought not to have been paid by the service provider. The matter already stands decided in the case of Intas Pharma Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad - 2013 (32) S.T.R. 543 (Tri.-Ahmd.). 4.3 A point was raised by the learned AR that the appellants are managing various units outside of SEZ who provide services to the appellants. And by paying Service Tax on the service provided to the SEZ unit, they managed to encash unutilized Cenvat credit through the pattern of first paying Service Tax in their unit outside of SEZ and then enabling the SEZ unit to take refund. I find that such practice cannot be held to be violating the legal framework under which recipient unit in SEZ cannot be made to suffer tax incidenc....