Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. R.D. Jolly for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) - Admit. 2. The following substantial question of law arises for consideration of this Court. "Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in remanding back the case to the Assessing Officer when the matter has been examined on merits by the Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g Officer or by CIT(A) who has co-terminus power with the Assessing Officer to find out the credit worthiness of these persons. The assessee has filed the bank statement of some of the persons, however, there is no finding by CIT(A) that there existed the equivalent or more amount in the bank account of these persons which was withdrawn and the same was deposited in cash with the share application....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve been received in cash or demand draft, the standard of proof would be much more rigorous and stringent. We direct the Assessing Officer to examine the share applicants. Needless to mention that a reasonable opportunity of being heard be given to the assessee." 4. However, when we went through the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) we find that he has examined the question of identit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act, 1961. The Supreme Court dismissing the SLP observed that if the share money is received by the assessee company from alleged bogus share holders whose names are given to the Assessing Officer, then the Department is free to proceed to assess them individually, in accordance with law. The Supreme Court did not find any infirmity with the impugned judgment of the High Court which was a common o....