Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel. For the Respondent : None ORDER 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 21.09.2022 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowing the respondent's appeal for enhancement of the interest awarded on the amount of refund. The concerned authority had awarded interest at the rate of 6% p.a on the amount deposited by the respon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... sanctioned. 4. The respondent claimed that it was entitled to a higher rate of interest and being aggrieved filed an appeal before the learned CESTAT. By the impugned order, the learned CESTAT has acceded to the said request and enhanced the rate of interest from 6% to 12% p.a. 5. Concededly, the tax effect is approximately Rs.23,91,220/-, which is below the threshold monetary limit for preferr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Cables (supra) were also followed by this Court in two other appeals: The Commissioner, Central Tax, Delhi v. Jovex International: CEAC 3/2022 and The Commissioner Central Excise and CGST South Delhi v. M/s Elegant Developers: SERTA 10/2022. He however states that the present matter involves a question of law and is not covered by the Instructions dated 22.08.2019 or 17.08.2011. 10. We are not pe....