Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the learned 3rd Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jagatsinghpur in MAC No.149 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs by way of writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India: "*** issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the TDS deducted from the interest awarded on compensation to the petitioners vide Annexure-5 shall be held as illegal and as to why opposite party No.4 shall not be directed to pay interest of Rs.9,250/- for one month to the petitioners and if the opposite parties failed to show cause or show insufficient cause make the Rule NISI absolute and allow the writ petition with cost." Facts of the case: 2. The petitioners, the wife and the children of the deceased, filed Motor Accident Claims Case being No.149 of 2013 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity be referred to as "MV Act") before the 3rd Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jagatsinghpur (MACT) consequent upon death of Sri Mahendra Kumar Sahoo in road accident on 07.01.2013. 2.1. The MACT vide Judgment and Order dated 17.10.2017 awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.17,90,760/- in favour of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., the interest payable to each of the petitioners by way of spreading over would come around Rs.35,944/-. This amount being less than Rs.50,000/-, in view of Section 194A(3)(ixa) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("IT Act" for short) as amended or Section 194A(3)(ix) as existed prior to amendment ibid. 3.2. It is further contended that the award of interest being made in terms of Section 171 of the MV Act, deduction of tax at source ought not to have been made as such an interest is awarded for delay in deposit of compensation as modified by the higher forum/Court. 3.3. To fortify aforesaid contentions, the learned counsel has cited Rupesh Rashmikant Vrs. Union of India, (2019) 417 ITR 169 (Bom); Court on its own Motion Vrs. The Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., (2015) 228 TAXMAN 151 (HP); The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. Vrs. Chinnadurai, AIR 2016 Mad 146; Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vrs. Kala Bai, MANU/MP/0755/2020. Arguments advanced by Senior Standing Counsel for the Income-Tax Department: 4. Referring to the counter-affidavit Sri Sidhartha Sankar Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel submitted that income by way of inter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., items A to E. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of sub-section (1), the following incomes, shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head 'Income from other sources', namely: *** (viii) income by way of interest received on compensation or on enhanced compensation referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 145B;" 145B. Taxability of certain income.- (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 145, the interest received by an assessee on any compensation or on enhanced compensation, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which it is received. (2) Any claim for escalation of price in a contract or export incentives shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which reasonable certainty of its realisation is achieved. (3) *** 194A. Interest other than 'interest on securities'.- (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest on securities, shall, at the time o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m from sufferings, agony and to rehabilitate them. The Court in Court on its Own Motion Vrs. The Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Others, (2015) 276 CTR 264 (HP) observed that: "We wonder how and under what provisions of law the Income Tax Authorities have treated the amount awarded or interest accrued on term deposits made in Motor Accident Claims cases as income. Therefore, the said Circular is against the concept and provisions referred to hereinabove and runs contrary to the mandate of granting compensation." 8.2. In The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. Vrs. Chinnadurai (supra) it has been held as follows: "Following the Division Bench Judgment, a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a recent decision, in New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vrs. Sudesh Chawla and Others, C.R. No.430- of 2015 (O&M), reiterating the reasoning given by the Division Bench of Himachal Pradesh High Court, has opined that award of compensation is on the principle of restitution to place the claimant in the same position in which he would have been loss of life or injury has not been suffered and accordingl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This is adjusted by a reasonable future rise in income. Multiplier is applied to ascertain future loss. The method of multiplier takes into account various factors and imponderables of life and, therefore, the multiplier is not equivalent to the full length of the remainder of the expected life of the deceased. The multiplier theory proceeds on the basis that with interest that may be earned on the compensation and a portion drawn from the capital should be equivalent to what the deceased would have contributed to his family. At the end of the period, the capital should be completely utilised. While awarding compensation, though the Claims Tribunal awards future loss in praesenti, interest is awarded for the period between filing of the application for claim till passing of the award for compensation. 8.8. Taking note of Abati Bezbaruah Vrs. Geological Survey of India, (2003) 3 SCC 148 in Dharampal Vrs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, (2008) 12 SCC 208 it has been held as follows: "8. As per Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred as "the Act") where the claim for compensation made under the Act is allowed by the Claims Tribunal, the T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... tax. This judgment was rendered before amendment in Section 145A of the Act. The Gujarat High Court in Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai Vrs. Income-Tax Officer, (2016) 388 ITR 343 (Guj), held that the ratio of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam (HUF) (supra), would continue to apply post amendment in Section 145A by virtue of Finance Act, 2009 also." 9.1. In Rupesh (supra), the Bombay High Court went on further to say that: "Culmination of discussion in these judgments would be that such interest is compensatory in nature and will thus, form part of the compensation itself. Compensation is computed with reference to the date of accident. All calculations of multiplicand and multiplier are based on such reference point. But computation by the Tribunal takes time. If compensation is revised by the High Court it takes further time. Interest is awarded keeping in mind the rate of inflation. Effort thus is to award just compensation. Awarding interest for delayed computation of compensation is therefore integral part of this exercise. *** The date of passing of the award by Claims Tribunal is the date on which the compensation is determined and the rig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ward or in case of Appeal, till the Judgment of the High Court in such Appeal, would not be exigible to tax, and such interest not being an income as such interest payable on account of delay in deposit of amount awarded shall not attract TDS under Section 194A. The nature of such interest paid/credited to the petitioners does not fall within the ambit of definition of "interest" contained in Section 2(28A). 10.3. In the instant case, it is not denied that interest was paid for delay in depositing the awarded amount. Reading of clause (28A) of Section 2 of the IT Act would show that in order to fall within the connotation of the term "interest", the money must be: i. Borrowed or debt incurred (including a deposit, claim or other similar right or obligation) and includes ii. Any service fee or other charge in respect of money borrowed or debt incurred or in respect of any credit facility which has not been utilized. 10.4. The marginal heading of Section 194A suggests that said provision deals with TDS in respect of "interest" definition of which term is given in Section 2(28A), but not "interest on securities" which expression is defined in Section 2(28B). Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....force in the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners and it is found in the instant case that if the interest is spread over year to year, the amount would not exceed Rs.50,000/-. Under such premise, the deduction of tax at source in respect of interest for delay in deposit of compensation before the MACT would attract provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 194A of the IT Act. 11.3. It is the argument of Sri Bisikesan Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioners that before deducting TDS the opposite party No.4 should have ensured Permanent Account Number (PAN) details from the petitioners. In this regard the following observation of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vrs. Yeliminti Appanna and Another, 2014 SCC OnLine AP 1175, is worthy of notice: "Be it noted that in case a claimant furnishes a declaration, on Form No. 15G of Rule 29C of the IT Rules in terms of Section 197(1A) of the IT Act or such other declaration on such Form as may be applicable, for each financial year, either to the person concerned or in the office of insurance company, in such a case the person/the insurance company is relieved of....