Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 269

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal:- "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs 1,82,00,000/- made by A.O. as unexplained investment in unlisted equities ignoring the facts that the identity and creditworthiness of entities from whom funds were taken to invest in unlisted equities during the financial year relevant to A.Y. 2015-16 were not established by the assessee company before the A.O. " 3. The assessee is a private limited company incorporated on 16.05.2000.It e-filed its return for A.Y. 2015-16 on 24.10.2015 at nil income. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the "Act") on 05.11.2015. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to large increase in investmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee has not borrowed any funds for purchase of equities during the year and has sufficient share capital and reserves to purchase the above shares. Certain more documents were also furnished. 4. The Ld. AO did not accept the explanation of the assessee for the reasons, among others, that though summons issued by him u/s 131 of the Act to the Principal Officers of M/s. Rasaraj Sales ltd. and M/s. Gunvardhan Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. on 23.10.2017 at their given address were duly served but they did not respond. He therefore held that the assessee could not prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction with M/s. Gunvardhan Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Rasaraj Sales Ltd. during the year. Accordingly, he added the amount of Rs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... before the AO and placed in paper book: S. No. Documents Page No. 1. Copy of Bank Statement of M/s Rajdarbar Breverages (P) Ltd. for the period from 01.04.2014-31.03.2015 118 2. Copy of confirmation along with Bank Statement & ITR of M/s Kashyap Property (P) Ltd. 129-131 5.1 In para 4.7 of his order, the Ld. CIT(A) has recorded his findings and deleted the impugned addition. Para 4.7 is reproduced below : "4.7 The source of investment during the year is from the funds received in return from group companies only which was invested earlier in 2009 and 2011. The flow of funds is supported by entries in book statements and reflected in Balance sheets of the respective companies. The fact that there were ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elf says that the summons issued by him to both the concerns u/s 131 of the Act were served at the given address. Therefore, identity of the concerns from which the assessee received the amount of Rs. 42,56,000/- and Rs. 1,39,44,000/- utilised towards purchase of 2,80,000 shares of M/s. Spectrum Distributors Pvt. Ltd. cannot be doubted. Balance sheet of these concerns for the year indicating their high networth was placed on record establishing their creditworthiness. The shares were purchased by the assessee from M/s. Kashyap Property Pvt. Ltd. (now known as Rajdarbar Group Pvt. Ltd.). Documentary evidence, namely copy of bank statement of M/s. Rajdarbar Beverages (P) Ltd. for the period from 01.04.2014 to 31.03.2015 as also copy of confir....