TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (2) TMI 213
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tes and B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, for the Appellant. Shri V. Sridharan, Sr. Advocate, Aditya Bhattacharya, Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Ms. Mounica Kasturi and Pranav Mundra, Advocates and M.P. Devanath, AOR, for the Respondent. ORDER As common question of law arises in this group of appeals and, as such, arise out of the impugned common judgment and order dated 2-5-2008 passed by the High Court [2009 (240....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Court were not maintainable in view of Section 35L of the Central Excise Act and the appeals ought to have been filed/preferred before this Court. 6. It is required to be noted that the question was whether respondents were liable to pay the Central Excise duty or not. The question is/was whether the respondents can be said to be manufacture of stators or not and therefore liable to pay cent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hile considering the pari materia provisions under the Customs Act, namely, Section 130 of the Customs Act, it is observed and held in para 11 as under : "11. Upon a conjoint reading of the aforesaid provisions, it could thus be seen that an appeal shall lie to the High Court against every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal, if the High Court is satisfied that the case involve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and relegating the Revenue to prefer the appeals before this Court. As the High Court has not considered the appeals on merits and/or on any other question, we have no other alternative but to remand the matter to the High Court to decide the appeals in accordance with law and on its own merits. 10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, all these appeals succeed in part. Th....