Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 1204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Hukugha Sema, CIT ORDER PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT (KZ):- The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata dated 03.10.2016 passed for A.Y. 2009-10. 2. In response to the notice of hearing, no one has come present on behalf of the assessee. On 23.08.2022, one alleged employee of the assessee-company Shri Amit S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etermining the total income at Rs.43,730/-. This order was set aside by the ld. Commissioner by exercising the powers under section 263 vide its order dated 01.03.2013. The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter issued notice under section 142(1) directing the assessee to submit the necessary evidence in support of its claim for share capital. The assessee wrote back to the ld. Assessing Officer that it....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l of the assessee was dismissed. 5. Before us, the assessee has not submitted any detail. The line of argument advanced by the assessee in the grounds of appeal is that in the proceeding under section 263, it has submitted the necessary details, therefore, it is incumbent upon the Revenue Authorities to call for those details from the record of ld. CIT and should have not made the addition. ....