TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (1) TMI 1078
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Ld. CIT(A) has erred while considering the Remand Report submitted by the Assessing Officer. 2. The Ld. C1T(A) itself has claimed the non-availability of the Remand Report while deciding the case. 3. Whether it is the fit case to restore the file back to the Ld. C1T(A) for fresh adjudication on the basis of the facts of the case and conclusion recorded by the C1T(A) while deciding the case. 4. The assessee has failed to reconcile the item-wise purchases made while under assessment before the Assessing Officer. 5. Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. C1T(A) is right in deleting the addition of Rs. 8,74,08,069/-. 6.1 Whether C1T(A) has erred when assessee has failed to produce the Invoices Value- wise of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r dated 17/07/2019 allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by deleting the addition made by the A.O. 5. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated 17/07/2019 the Department of Revenue has preferred the present appeal on the grounds mentioned above. 6. The Ld. DR has vehemently contended that the Ld.CIT(A) has erred while considering the remand report submitted by the Assessing Officer, wherein the Ld.CIT(A) himself claimed the non-availability of remand report while deciding the case. Further submitted that, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred when the assessee has failed to produced the invoice value of the total figure in question before the Assessing Officer . 7. Per contra, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has relied on the order of the CIT(....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....espective of our purchase price weather it is 10$ or 849$. This creates a huge difference in our purchase value and value given by CBEC." 10. The above said clarification given by the assessee has not been accepted by the Ld. A.O. and made the addition. It is to be noted that subsequent year i.e. Assessment Year 2016-17 was also scrutinized on the same issue and was accepted on returned income. Besides the same, the Ld.CIT(A) has called for the remand report of the A.O. to verify the comment on purchase value invoice value and accessible value of the goods imported during the relevant period. The relevant extract of the remand report is as under:- "2.3 Detailed CBEC data of import was generated from the ITD system which contain date det....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... = Rs.8,43,61,974.28/-. Assessee was asked to provide BE wise details of purchase/imports alongwith invoices/import bills and bills of entry and bank account statements. Assessee has furnished data of imports and reconciliation of the same in tabular form (copy enclosed as Annexure A-4). The same has been examined and found in order. After reconciliation of the bills of entry, purchase invoice, shipping bills and bank statement of assessee, it has been found that the invoice value of imported bills has been considered as purchase value in the books of accounts of the assessee. A clarification was sought from a Authorities in regards to higher assessable value of import goods. Vide letter dated C.No. VIII/CD/TKD/64G/Gr. Il/Misc Report ....