Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 981

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the respondent authority essentially on two counts firstly, because the order of cancellation of registration is in breach of principle of natural justice being very cryptic and non-reasoned order and secondly, the appellate authority on the ground of its not having powers to condone the delay has chosen not to decide the matter on merit. 2. The prayers sought for are as follow: "A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition; B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition; C. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside order bearing No.498 Dispatch No.3977/78 dtd. 22.09.2022 (Anne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y efficacious remedy, the petitioner is before this Court. 6. On advanced notice, the learned AGP, Ms. Pooja Ashar has appeared. She has pointed out to this Court that in absence of any reasonable ground, the delay cannot be condoned and even if, that be the case the statutory limit provides for the delay be condoned by the appellate authority for the period of 30 days which is way beyond the stipulated time period and hence, there is no error in the order of the appellate authority. 7. Having heard the learned advocate, Mr.D.K.Trivedi for the petitioner and learned AGP, Ms. Ashar for respondent, in our opinion, the matter is covered by the decision of this Court rendered in case of Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works vs. State of Guja....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Court vide judgments in the cases of Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. District Collector, Raigad [2012] 4 SCC 407, Sant Lal Gupta v. Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. [2010] 13 SCC 336; Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. vs. Masood Ahmed Khan [2010] 9 SCC 496; Abdul Ghaffar vs. State of Bihar [2008] 3 SCC 258, has expanded the horizon of natural justice and reasons have been treated part of the natural justice. It has gone to the extent in holding that reasons are heart and soul of the order. The absence of reasons renders an order indefensible/unsustainable particularly when it is subject to appeal/revision. It is to be noted that in the case of Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court after considering various judgments for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....All these decisions serve one common purpose which is to demonstrate by reason that the relevant factors have been objectively considered. This is important for sustaining the litigants' faith in the justice delivery system. j. Insistence on reason is a requirement for both judicial accountability and transparency. k. If a judge or a quasi-judicial authority is not candid enough about his/her decision making process then it is impossible to know whether the person deciding is faithful to the doctrine of precedent or to principles of incrementalism. l. Reasons in support of decisions must be cogent, clear and succinct. A pretence of reasons or 'rubber-stamp reasons' is not to be equated with a valid decision making....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the case of MRF Mazdoor Sangh v. Commissioner of Labour 2014 (3) ALT 265, wherein the matter of cancellation of registration of trade union, it was held that: "The show cause notice should reflect the jurisdictional facts based on which the final order is proposed to be passed. The person proceeded against would then have an opportunity to show cause that the authority had erroneously assumed existence of a jurisdictional fact and, since the essential jurisdictional facts do not exist, the authority does not have jurisdiction to decide the other issues." xxx 19.. In the result, all the writ applications deserve to be allowed solely on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and, accordingly, the w....