Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 829

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the assessee read as under:- "1. The Assessing Officer erred in disallowing part of the construction expenses incurred by the assessee in constructing house property under the facts & circumstances of the case. 2. The Assessing Officer erred in disallowing investment made by the assessee in purchasing adjacent property forming part of original property under the facts & circumstances of the case. 3. The Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs.75,56,398/- under capital gains and levying of tax Rs.22,73,720/- under the facts & circumstances of the case. " Evidently, the sole grievance of the assessee arises out of computation of capital gains. 2. The Registry has noted delay of 7 days in the appeal, the condonation of wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....which was not done and accordingly, the deduction was to be restricted to the extent of investment made up-to that date. This was as per the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Humayun Suleman Merchant vs CIT (23 Taxmann.com). Since the property purchased on 29.11.2013 fall beyond one year from the date of sale i.e., 23.02.2015, no deduction would be available to the extent of Rs.45 Lacs. The amount spent on investment and construction up-to 31.07.2015 in second property purchased on 29.04.2015 aggregated to Rs.156.80 Lacs which alone would be eligible for deduction u/s 54F. 5. The relevant dates and chronology of events was tabulated by ld. CIT(A) as under: - No. Dates Events 1 18.08.2004 Appellant acquired vacant land at Sholl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not deposited in Capital Gains Account Scheme. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. Our findings and Adjudication 6. It could be seen that the assessee has entered into sale agreement dated 15.05.2013 for sale of property for Rs.283 Lacs. The terms of the sale agreement has been honored and the intended purchaser has paid sale consideration from time to time. The full sale consideration has been paid on 16.12.2013 whereas sale deed has been executed on 23.02.2015. The possession is stated to be handed over on 15.10.2014. As against installments so received, the assessee has purchased land on 29.11.2013 which falls within one year from receipt of full sale consideration as well as handing over of the possession. Undispu....