2023 (1) TMI 790
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....STICE P. SAM KOSHY For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Govt. Adv. ORDER 1. Grievance of the Petitioner seems to be the additional tax liability that the Petitioner has incurred towards the payment of GST to the Respondents. 2. Contention of learned Counsel for Petitioner is that when the Work Order dated 25.4.2022 that was issued to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es. The Engineer in Charge shall reimburse the amount of such new tax on submission of proof of such payments of tax by the Contractor. 4. According to learned Counsel for Petitioner, the said Order dated 30.9.2022 also has a Clause to the effect that, in the event if there is a reduction in the tax rate, the Contractor would also have to reimburse the said amount to the State Government. Therefo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s made in the light of the Order issued by the Water Resources Department itself on 30.9.2022 in this regard wherein Clause 2.17.1 stands amended. 7. The limited prayer of the Petitioner is not opposed by the learned State Counsel. However, the learned State Counsel submits that the representation would have to be decided strictly in accordance with the provisions of Law and the Contract, governi....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI