Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent (AR), for the Respondent ORDER RAMESH NAIR This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. AHM-EXCUS-001-APP-126-2019-20 dated 23.03.2020 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Ahmedabad. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed refund claim of Rs. 91,23,906/- ( Rs. 51,16,092/- towards service tax paid and Rs. 40,07,815/- towards interest of Service tax paid) o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aimed the refund from the department. The refund claim was sanctioned to the appellant but interest on account of delayed refund was not given to the appellant on the ground that there was no delay in sanctioning of refund amount as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority, and held that interest liabilit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd is granted of any tax illegally collected, without authority of law is eligible to interest from the date of payment of duty to the date of actually payment of refund. He placed reliance on following decisions. • Ebiz.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise- 2017(49)STR 389 (All) • Binjrajka Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-III 20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of deposit till its realization. Further, the issue is no longer res integra as the Division Bench of this Tribunal in Parle Agro (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST - 2021-TIOL-306-CESTAT-ALL, following the ruling of the Apex Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd. - 2006 (196) E.L.T. 257 (S.C.) = 2007 (8) S.T.R. 193 (S.C.) have held that such amount deposited during investigation and/or pending litigation is ips....