2020 (11) TMI 1089

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... engaged in the business of hundred percent export of Information Technology Enable Services (ITES). Assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2012- 13 on 29.11.2012 declaring income of Rs. 122,61,31,240/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) dated 14.08.2013 was issued and served upon the assessee. AO on the basis of Form 3CEB filed along with the return of income noticed that assessee had international transactions with Associated Enterprises (AE)/ concerns. He, therefore, in order of determine Arm's Length Price (ALP) in relation to the international transactions referred the matter to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The TPO vide order passed u/s 92CA(2) dated 29.01.2016 suggested an adjustment of Rs. 1,94,32,824/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of comparables. 2. The appellant craves leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal." 4. Before us, Learned DR submitted that during the course of TPO proceedings, TPO rejected/ modified the filters applied by the assessee in the transfer pricing documentation and arrived at the average of 23.73% by including Accentia Technologies Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd. (Seg) and Eclerx Services Ltd. He submitted that the companies namely Accentia Technologies Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd. (Seg) and Eclerx Services Ltd. were rightly considered by the TPO to the comparable companies but CIT(A) has erred in directing their exclus....