Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....G.S. Chouhan Judgment The present D.B. Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS, Jaipur against the order dated 05.01.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in IOTA No.01/JODH/2020 for the Assessment Year 2018- 19, whereby the appeal against the order of learned CIT (A-1), Udaipur d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....required to deducted. 14. Counsel for the appellant rightly contended that in the agreement which was entered between the parties, there is no restriction of private practice whereas in case of service/appointment order, there is prohibition for grant of benefit which are required to be given under the law and are granted to the employees whereas in the case of retainership it is only an ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... decided as under: "The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the assessee that CIT had issued an order under s. 10(23C)(via) of the Act, by virtue of which the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS under s. 194-I as the recipient itself is exempted from levy of tax, is not acceptable for the reasons that the said order was issued by the CIT, Panaji for the asst. yr. 2005-06 to 2....