Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: Mr. Sree Gurukrishna, SR. Adv., Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv., Ms. Reena Roy, Adv., Mr. Akhil Abraham, Adv., Mr. Yaudhinder Lal, Adv., Ms. Purva, Adv. And Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR For the Respondent(s) : Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR, Mr. Abdulla Naseeh V.T., Adv. And Ms. Meena K. P., Adv. ORDER The present petition has been filed assailing action of the Revenue Authorities invoking sub-Section (5) of Section 6 o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cation to the provision which was neither contemplated nor been permitted under the statute to the Assessing Authority. The High Court after revisiting the Scheme of the Act, 1976 and sub-Section (5) to Section 6, in particular, arrived at a conclusion that the reassessment could have been made at least of previous five years to the amendment made and may not be considered to be retrospective in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....igh Court finally arrived at a conclusion that the reassessment made by the Assessing Authority for the year 2000-01 was beyond the period of 5 years and accordingly reassessment could not have been made and partly relief was granted to the petitioner/company so far as the reassessment year 2000-01 is concerned, but at the same time upheld the reassessment's made for the subsequent years 2001-02 t....