2022 (12) TMI 1306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onal Lockdown imposed on account of pandemic Covid-19. Therefore, the delay of 107 days are condoned. 3. Ground No. 1 raised by the assessee challenging the action of AO in assuming jurisdiction u/s. 147 of the Act. In this regard, the ld. AR did not advance any arguments, hence, no adjudication is required. 4. Ground No. 2 raised by the assessee challenging the action of CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the AO u/s. 69A of the Act. 5. Heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. I note that the assessee is an individual and derives income from agency business of Haldiram Foods. It is noted that for the year under consideration, the assessee was a store keeper in the Jagdamba Traders. The ADIT (Inv.)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....grieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The assessee made submissions through ITBA portal. According to the CIT(A) that no proper replies filed in First Appellate proceedings, only an affidavit stating that the assessee has only one bank account in Omprakash Deora Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd., Hingoli. According to the CIT(A) no onus has been discharged by the assessee before him and no supporting evidences like books of accounts, bank statements etc. were filed in support of contentions made by the assessee. The CIT(A) confirmed the view of AO in adding the said amount of Rs.15,00,000/- to the total income of the assessee u/s. 69A of the Act. The ld. AR, Shri Mahavir Atal drew my attention to the a....