TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (9) TMI 1293
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re and other activities of the Association and shall not be distributed among the members of anybody. 2. In the Assessment for AY 07-08, the disputes raised by the Assessee relates to (i) bringing to tax interest on fixed deposits received from banks which is a member of the Assessee; (ii) bringing to tax interest received on deposits with BESCOM which is mandatory for getting electricity service connection; (iii) income from diesel generator operation. The claim of the Assessee with regard to non-taxability of the aforesaid items of income is based on the principle of mutuality which was rejected by the revenue authorities. 3. As far as the interest on fixed deposits is concerned, the issue has to be decided against the Assessee in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club v. CIT [2013] 350 ITR 509 : 212 Taxman 566 : 29 Taxman 29. The facts of the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court were that assessee sought an exemption from payment of income tax on interest earned on FD kept with certain banks, which were corporate members of assessee, on basis of doctrine of mutuality. The AO rejected assessee's claim, holding that there was....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dy on record. Hence, the additional ground is admitted for adjudication. 6. The facts relevant for adjudication of the issue raised by the Assessee with regard to interest on deposit with BESCOM are as follows. The Assessee has to keep as deposit 3 months minimum deposit (3 MMD) as deposit with BESCOM for availing service connection. The Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bangalore, in exercise of powers conferred under Clause 181 read with clause 47(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Central Act 36 of 2003) has framed the K.E.R.C. (Interest on Security Deposit) Regulations, 2005. In terms of Regulation 3.1 thereof the electricity supply company has to pay interest on security deposit of consumer at the bank rates prevailing as on the 1st day of April of the financial year for which interest is due. In terms of Regulation 3.2 thereof the accrued interest on security deposit for each financial year shall be credited to the Consumer's account during the first quarter of the subsequent financial year and be adjusted against the consumption charges. 7. The learned counsel for the Assessee pointing out to the above regulations submitted before us that interest income only ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re necessary for maintaining its status and other obligations as per memorandum & articles of association. The Tribunal took the view that the association can run only through certain staff and that for proper management and making of deposits, the expenses of maintaining the staff are necessary and allowable as deduction against interest income. 8. The Ld. DR, on the other hand, submitted that on the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club (supra), interest earned on deposits with BESCOM is akin to deposits made by the association with banks. His further submission was that the electricity charges which is set off against the interest on 'three months minimum deposit' (3MMD) cannot be said to be an expenditure incurred in earning interest on deposit with BESCOM u/s. 57(iii) of the Act. 9. We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions. It is seen from the facts of the case that the assessee is an association of owners of various commercial areas owned by different persons and located in a building known as Manipal Centre. The association is formed for the purpose of promoting peaceful and mutual beneficial way o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....serves to be allowed based on the decisions relied upon by the learned counsel for the Assessee. As far as the plea of the assessee for allowing general & administrative expenses based on the decision of the ITAT Bangalore Bench decision in the case of Defence/Govt. Official Site Owners Association (supra) is concerned, we are of the view that on the facts of the present case, there was no necessity for managing and placing the deposit with BESCOM. In the case decided by the Tribunal, the factual basis was that there was a necessity for proper management by placing and making various deposits and for this purpose, the use of the services of the staff was necessary. No such facts exist in the present case. 13. For the reasons given above, we are of the view that the plea of the assessee for non-taxability of interest on deposits with BESCOM on the principle of mutuality is not accepted but the plea of the assessee for allowing set off of electricity consumption expenses against interest received from BESCOM is accepted. 14. The ground regarding the third item of receipts of Rs. 5,880 on account of diesel generation operation was not pressed and the same is dismissed as not presse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....its with the bank which were no doubt members of the club, for the funds so placed with the banks could be used by the bank in any other commercial operation and at this stage, the principle of mutuality got severed. In our view, the aforesaid principle cannot be extended to the receipt of interest for late payment of subscription by members. In our view, the interest on late payment of subscription charges would assume the same character as subscription charges and would be well within the principle of mutuality. It is not in dispute that insofar as the membership fee is collected by the assessee from its members is concerned, the claim of the assessee that the same is not taxable on the principle of mutuality has been accepted by the revenue. Applying the same principle, we are of the view that interest on late payment of subscription would not be taxable by applying the principle of mutuality. Accordingly, we hold that the sum in question cannot be brought to tax. 20. The next item is rents received from ICON Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. ["ICON" for short]. The facts that are necessary for adjudication of the aforesaid issue are as follows. The property bearing No. 47, Dicke....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eceipt on 05.04.2007. All these additional documents, in our opinion, are required for proper adjudication of the issues involved in the appeal and the same are admitted as additional evidence. 23. According to the revenue, a sum of Rs. 18,64,130 received by the assessee is taxable and not exempt on the principle of mutuality. According to the revenue, the same is nothing but rent for use of various areas belonging to the assessee received from ICON and would be taxable and not exempt by applying the principle of mutuality. The main reason given by the AO for not accepting the plea of the assessee is as follows: "8. As already stated, M/s. MCOCA basically consists of two blocks (North and South). These two blocks house all the 260 members of the association. M/s. ICON Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. is an independent and a completely separate block. M/s. ICON Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. does not own any units in north and south block of Manipal Centre which is a prerequisite to be a member of the association as per the bye laws of the association. Further, M/s. ICON Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. has filed a letter dated 18.7.2011 stating that, they are not paying any maintenance charges with is fu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ociation and that the electricity consumption charges being paid by ICON was only because of the existence of a common distribution point for the whole complex. It was his submission that the MOU is an independent agreement as between two strangers and the element of mutuality is completely absent. He further submitted that the fact that at a later point of time ICON became a member of the Assessee will not bring in the concept of mutuality as between the Assessee and ICON. It was also his submission that but for the payment of monthly charges, ICON could not as a matter of right use any of the facilities which were subject matter of the MOU. 27. We have considered the rival submissions. Exemption from tax on receipts applying the Principle of mutuality is applicable to a certain receipt, which does not have any characteristics of income. When several persons join together in a common activity, which is definitely not a trade or business, and they all contribute money for the common activity and any remnant or surplus from such contributions, after the common activity is carried out, is returned to the same contributors as participators to the activity, then the receipt of the sha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oncept in "The Law and Practice of Income Tax" (8th Edn. Vol. I, 1990) at p. 113 as follows: "...The contributors to the common fund and the participators in the surplus must be an identical body. That does not mean that each member should contribute to the common fund or that each member should participate in the surplus or get back from the surplus precisely what he has paid." The Madras, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala High Courts have held that the test of mutuality does not require that the contributors to the common fund should willy-nilly distribute the surplus amongst themselves: it is enough if they have a right of disposal over the surplus, and in exercise of that right they may agree that on winding up the surplus will be transferred to a similar association or used for some charitable objects...." 19. The second feature demands that the actions of the participators and contributors must be in furtherance of the mandate of the association. In the case of a club, it would be necessary to show that steps are taken in furtherance of activities that benefit the club, and in turn its members. Therefore, in Chelmsford Club (supra), since the appellant pr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ll that a company does is to collect money from a certain number of people -it does not matter whether they are called members of the company, or participating policy holders - and apply it for the benefit of those same people, not as shareholders in the company, but as the people who subscribed it, then, as I understand the New York case, there is no profit. If the people were to do the thing for themselves, there would be no profit, and the fact that they incorporate a legal entity to do it for them makes no difference, there is still no profit. This is not because the entity of the company is to be disregarded, it is because there is no profit, the money being simply collected from those people and handed back to them, not in the character of shareholders, but in the character of those who have paid it. That, as I understand it, is the effect of the decision in the New York case." (Emphasis supplied) 22. In Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund Ltd. AIR 1965 SC 96, this Court differentiated the facts of the case before it from those of Styles case (supra) and denied the exemption of mutuality because of the taint of commerciality. It was o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....we shall now look into the facts of the present case. At the outset, we should admit that the facts, as it emanates from the orders of the authorities below, are vague. It is however clear that on 28.6.2006 when the MOU was entered into between the Assessee and ICON, ICON was not a member of the Assessee. The Assessee was registered as a Society under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 as early as 21.9.1990. It was formed, among other objects, for providing all facilities and other amenities to the owners/occupants of the apartments/units without hindrance, to promote and strive for a peaceful and mutually beneficial way of living among all members of association particularly in relation to the mutual existence in the building. The Memorandum Association of the Assessee specifically provides that the income and profits derived from the above objects shall be utilized for the expenditure and other activities of the Association and shall not be distributed among the members. As per the bye-laws of the Assessee, the membership of the Association is open to any person without any restriction as to caste or creed and to those natural persons who have completed the age of 18 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... rightly characterized as Rent for use of the common area of North and South Block. In this regard we observe that there is no material on record nor is it the case of the Assessee that the Association caters to maintenance of the Hotel Block or any common area of the hotel block. All that the hotel block had to do with the North and South Block was that they shared common road which allowed ingress and egress to the hotel block from Dickenson road. Just by becoming a member of the Assessee ICON cannot therefore seek to call themselves as contributors as the purpose for which the contributors get together and contribute has to be the same. Let us assume that a third party who has nothing to do with the Complex Manipal Centre becomes its members because as per the bye-laws of the Assessee it is not necessary that a person should own commercial space in the complex Manipal Centre. The third party gets a right to use a common area in North and South Block. Can the consideration paid by the third party to the Assessee for use of common space be said to be the same character as maintenance charges paid by a member owning commercial space in the complex Manipal Centre. In our view it can....