Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (12) TMI 1167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder Section 148 by respondent no.1 stating that respondent no.1 has reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax for Assessment Year 2015-16 has escaped assessment. This notice required the Petitioner to file returns within 30 days. 4. Despite receipt of the above notice, the Petitioner did not bother to file any returns within 30 days. Almost eight months later, that is, on 03.01.2022, the Petitioner was served with a notice under Section 142(1) from ITI requiring the Petitioner to furnish accounts and documents to enable the respondents to proceed with the reassessment in terms of the notice dated 27.03.2021, which the Petitioner had not bothered to respond. 5. At this belated stage, the Petitioner, vide communication dated 14.01.2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h circumstances. 10. Ms S. Linhares counters the submissions made by Mr Panandiker. She submits that the Petitioner did not bother to file any returns for Assessment Year 2015-16 and, therefore, the provision of Section 147 of the IT Act was squarely attracted. She points out that the Petitioner did not bother responding to the notice dated 27.03.2021 within the prescribed period. She submits that the delayed return filed by the Petitioner was only to frustrate the time limits prescribed to the Assessing Officers for completing the assessment. She submits that there is clear information about the Petitioner receiving an amount of Rs. 2.74 crores and interest  of Rs.2,15,107/-. Coupled with the fact that no returns were filed for the r....