Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (12) TMI 1158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the business of trading of Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and parts thereof. The return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 was filed on 30.09.2014 declaring total income of Rs.27,83,430/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(4), Pune ('the Assessing Officer') vide order dated 29.11.2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') at a total income of Rs.2,21,92,970/-. The disparity between the retuned income and assessed income is on account of not allowing the business loss incurred on account of expenditure incurred from the date of set-off of the business against the interest income earned on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as made before the ld. CIT(A) contended the expenses incurred during the intervening period between setting up and actual business should be allowed as deduction placing reliance on the following plethora of judicial precedents :- (i) Carefour WC & C. India (P.) Ltd. vs. DICT, 53 taxmann.com 289 (Delhi). (ii) CIT vs. Dhoomketu Builders & Developments (P.) Ltd., 34 taxmann.com 18 (Delhi). (iii) Maruti Insurance Broking (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT, 127 taxmann.com 685 (Delhi). (iv) Ashoke Marketing Ltd. vs. CIT, 73 Taxman 126 (Cal.). 6. On the other hand, ld. Sr. DR placing reliance on the order of the ld. CIT(A) submits that no interference is called for. 7. We heard the rival submissions and perused the mate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ucts Ltd. vs. CTI, 26 ITR 151 (Bom.). In the present case, the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT(A) simply discussed the legal principle without adverting to the material facts on record and had not really decided whether the appellant company had set-up of business and ready to commence the business or not. On perusal of the Profit & Loss Account placed at Paper Book indicates that certain expenditure was incurred in connection with business which was sold were also debited to the Profit & Loss Account. Therefore, the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT(A) had failed to examine the nexus of the expenditure incurred and the new business stated to have been set-up. In these circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that ....