Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 1306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appeal has come up for fresh hearing before this bench. 2. This appeal arises out of final assessment order dated 28-07-2016 passed by learned Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144(C) r.w.s. 92CA of the Act pursuant to the directions of learned Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bangalore u/s. 144C(5) dated 30-05-2016. Though the assessee has raised multiple grounds of appeal, however, in sum and substance, the assessee is aggrieved by downward adjustment of Rs.89.18 Lacs to the value of international Transaction of Finance & General administration related service charges. 3. The Ld. AR, appearing for assessee, raised various arguments to assail the adjustments made by lower authorities and for the same, relied on various judicial prono....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....parable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method which was opposed by the assessee on the ground that in the absence of comparable data, CUP method could not be applied. Further, these transactions were inter-related and inter-linked and related to manufacturing operations undertaken by the assessee. Therefore, the determination of ALP on TNMM would be most suitable method. However, the same could not convince Ld. TPO. The Ld. TPO also noted that the assessee was required to make payment prior to its receiving of services and the need to avail such service may not arise during the normal course of business of the assessee. Though the other services arising out of same agreement translated into certain benefits to the assessee, however, the assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....med the services of finance / general management to be in the nature of stewardship services and alleged that the assessee did not submit any evidence of the receipt of services disregarding the fact that these services were emanating from the same agreement. The rendering of services was duly evidenced by the agreement as well as debit notes issued against the assessee. The copies of email / correspondences to support the receipt of services were duly furnished (43 to 88 of paperbook). Another observation of Ld. TPO is that the assessee may not be requiring these services in the normal course of business. The same, in our opinion, is not correct approach since the role of Ld. TPO was limited to determine the ALP of the transactions and not....