1990 (4) TMI 308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the facts and in the circumstances of the case, there was any mistake apparent from the record within the meaning of s. 254(2) of the IT Act in the Tribunals order on ITA No. 849(Cal) of 1981, dt. 24th September, 1982, which could be rectified by the Tribunal by its subsequent order ?" 2. The assessment year involved is 1977-78. 3. In this case the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Reven....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der this Chapter) shall alone be deemed to be the amount of income of that nature which is derived or received by the assessee and which is included in his gross total income". In view of this new provision, we are of the opinion that the cases relied on by the assessees counsel do not help the assessee and the deduction under s. 80T is to be allowed in the amount of capital gain which is inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....81, without having any retrospective effect. On the other hand, we see that the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. V. Venkatachalam [1979] 120 ITR 688 (Mad) is a direct authority on the point at issue wherein it has been held that relief under s. 80T will have to be worked out in the gross amount of capital gain. Respectfully following the aforesaid decision of the Madras Hig....