Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

2017 (6) TMI 1379

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....shra, DR for the respondent JUDGEMENT Per Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against the order in appeal no. 13-16/2012 dated 12.03.2012 and 17-20/2012 dated 13.03.2012. 2. In both the appeals, the issue is common and i.e. pertaining to the credit of input services. Hence both the appeals are disposed of by this common order. The disputed period is September 2004 to Marc....

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

.... Courts and Tribunal. The issue is no longer res integra since all services are covered by various decisions in favour of the appellant: i) Port Services: CCE Jaipur Vs. Hindustan Zinc vide final order no. A/1231/2012 dated 01.10.2012 and CC Rajkot Vs. Rolex Rings Pvt. Ltd. 2008 (230) ELT 569 (Tr-Ahmd.) ii) Cargo Handling Services: CCE Raipur Vs. HEG Ltd. 2010 (18) STR 56 (Tri-Del) and Central....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2017 (6) TMI 1379