Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (12) TMI 681

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Act'), for belated filing of income tax return under section 139(4) of the Act. 2. This is the second round of proceedings before the Tribunal. The sole issue involved in all these appeals is regarding challenging the penalty imposed by the AO under section 274F of the Act . 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income for all the assessment years as per section 139(4) of the Act. The details of the income tax filed are as under: Sl. No. Assessment Year Due date to file return of income under section 139(1) of the Act Date of filing of Return of Income Returned income as per Return of Income Income Tax Paid 1. 2012-13 31/08/2012 07/12/2013 1,89,710/- 1160/- ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rits. The CIT(A) passed order u/s 250 r.w.s. 254 of the Act on 18.08.2022. The CIT(A) in pursuant to the direction of the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee. The relevant part of the order is as under: "I have perused the facts as well as argument taken on behalf of the appellant. Since, the appellant had taxable income therefore he was under obligation to file regular return of income which has not been done. As the assessee's total income exceeded the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, for the said assessment year, the assessee was required to file the return of income within the due date specified u/s139(1) of the Income Tax Act,1961. The appellant failed to furnish valid explanation as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the other hand, the learned DR relied on the order of the lower authorities and he submitted that the penalty under section 274 of the Act is an expressed provision and the assessee did not file his return of income within the prescribed time limit as per section 139(1) of the Act and the income was above the taxable limit. Therefore, he is liable for penalty under section 271F of the Act. There was no reasonable cause mentioned by the assessee before the authorities below as well as the before the Tribunal. He also submitted that there is no time limit for issue of notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s. 271F of the Act and the penalty order passed by the AO was well within the time after issue of notice. Therefore, the contention of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore us, could not point out any reasonable cause so as to any reasonable cause can be considered for granting relief to the assessee as per section 273B of the Act. Accordingly, we uphold the order of the lower authorities and dismiss the appeals of the assessee. 10.1 If the assessee's is liable to pay income tax and file returns subsequently. He will be liable for penalty as per section 271F quoted supra. From the facts noted above, the assessee's total income for the relevant Assessment Years was above the taxable limit in spite of the fact that he did not file his return of income within due date as specified under section 139(1) of the Act in any of the above assessment year . Therefore, he is liable for penalty under section 271F of....