2022 (12) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g officer to the income on the plea that this amount is may have been used for meeting house hold expenses. The addition is confirmed based on surmises, conjectures and on hypothetical reasonings, the same is bad in law. 2. That on the facts and in law and under the circumstances, the commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) erred in observing that the house hold expenses are borne by the lady appellant while the house hold expenses are withdrawn by the husband of the appellant. The addition of Rs, 8,00,000/- is confirmed without considering fairly and judiciously the submissions made and evidence placed on record. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the commissioner of Income circumstances the Commissioner of In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this submission of the assessee is unbelievable and unrealistic and held that the deposits are unexplained. He added the same u/s 68 of the Act. 4. Against the above order, the assessee appealed before the ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) referred to the submissions and found it difficult to believe that the assessee had met day to day expenses by claiming that nominal amount. The Ld. CIT(A) on ad-hoc basis confirmed Rs.8,00,000/- and deleted Rs.11,45,000/-. 6. Against this order, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 7. I have heard both the parties and perused the record. The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that this addition of deposits found in bank statement cannot be added u/s 68 of the Act as the assessee is not requ....