2022 (12) TMI 434

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Income Tax Appeals Ld CIT (A)] has erred in upholding the impugned assessment order passed by the learned assessing officer (Ld. A.0) without having any lawful jurisdiction as a. there were no cogent reasons to believe that the Income had escaped assessment and accordingly the provisions of section 147 & 148 were not applicable to the case, b. the objections raised by & on behalf of the appellant were not at all considered by the ld A.O before assuming the jurisdiction u/s 147 and c. no notices u/s 143(2) or 142(1) were issued or served on the appellant d. The impugned assessment order has been upheld by the Ld. CIT(A) on the basis of perverse and arbitrary finding of facts 2. Without prejudice t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....k note of the additional information he received from the DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai dated 26.12.2013 wherein it was stated that assessee was involved in bogus claim of expenses to the tune of Rs.15,42,20,343/-. And then the AO after taking notice that the AR of the assessee attended before him on 24.03.2014, records in the assessment order that assessee/AR was furnished with the "reason for reopening" along with transaction regarding data of Hawala Purchases received from DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai, viz Copy of AIR (ITS) data; and the AO notes that he confronted the assessee with the adverse material and asked him to explain about the adverse information with supporting evidence if any. However, according to AO, the assessee failed to satisfactorily exp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee's case within the meaning of the provisions of section 147 of the Act dated on 27.11.2011. Notice u/s 148 issued. VIJAY P. MARU Income Tax Officer 24 (3)--2 Mumbai. 6. According to the Ld. AR, from a perusal of the aforesaid reasons recorded for reopening u/s 147 of the Act would reveal that the AO has not satisfied the essential condition precedent for reopening the assessment. According to him, based on the information from DGIT (Inv.) the AO has jumped to the conclusion that there is escapement of income i.e only based on the investigation report of the DGIT(Inv.), the AO has concluded that assessee's income has escaped assessment which is bad in law because, the essential condition precedent for re-opening i.e "reas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ality of assessment proceedings. Quietus of the completed assessment can be disturbed only when there is information or evidence regarding undisclosed income or AO had information in his possession showing escapement of income. As per section 147 of the Act, the AO is empowered to reopen the assessment if he has "reasons to believe escapement of income". "Reasons to believe" postulates foundation based on information and belief based on reason. Even if there is foundation based on information, there still must be some reason warrant holding a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 8. In the present case, when we have to adjudicate the legal issue as to whether the AO had satisfied the condition precedent for validly....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e DGIT(Inv.) regarding bogus claim of expenses of Rs.6,16,79,235/- which means that DGIT (Inv.) had passed on an information to the AO regarding the assessee's claim of expenses to the tune of Rs.6,16,79,235/-purported to have been transacted with various parties which was bogus. And the AO states in the second line of the reasons recorded that he had "reason to believe that income chargeable to tax of Rs.6,16,79,235/- for AY. 2009-10 has escaped assessment''. From the aforesaid reason to re-open the assessment, we note that the AO only had foundation based on information which was not sufficient to invoke jurisdiction for re-opening the assessment. In this case, next essential condition is found to be absent i.e, the believe based on reaso....