2020 (1) TMI 1612

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r short 'A.R') for the assessee took us through the facts narrated in the application filed by the assessee, and submitted, that the order passed by the Tribunal while disposing off the appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 382/Mum/2017 for A.Y. 2007-08 suffered from two mistakes, viz. (i) the claim of the assessee that as the time limit for passing an order under Sec.201 had already expired, therefore, no disallowance was warranted under Sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act had remained un-adjudicated; and (ii) the alternative claim of the assessee that in case if the disallowance under Sec.40(a)(ia) was to be sustained, the same was liable to be restricted to the extent of 30% of the total amount of the service coupons had not been answered. It was submi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assailed the validity of the disallowance under Sec.40(a)(ia) also on the aforesaid two grounds, viz. (i) that, as the time limit for passing an order under Sec.201 had already expired, therefore, no disallowance was warranted under Sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act; and (ii) that, in case if the disallowance under Sec.40(a)(ia) was to be sustained, the same was liable to be restricted to the extent of 30% of the total amount of the service coupons. We have perused the order passed by the Tribunal while disposing off the aforesaid appeal in ITA No.382/Mum/2017, vide its order dated 14.05.2019. As can be gathered from a perusal of the Page 6 - Para 6 of the aforesaid order, we find, that the assessee had specifically assailed the disallowance under ....